Mastering transaction monitoring: Techniques and compliance in spotting suspicious activities


Suspicious transactions are financial enigmas – not illegal by default but sufficiently atypical to demand scrutiny. These transactions are anomalies, deviating from a customer’s expected financial behaviour or a business’s standard operations. Recognizing these peculiarities is fundamental to effective transaction monitoring.

RegTech firm Flagright recently outlined a step-by-step guide to investigate suspicious activities.

A suspicious transaction evokes doubt, unease, or mistrust. It’s less about the transaction’s magnitude and more about its deviation from expected patterns. These transactions may contrast with a customer’s financial habits, business activities, or risk profile. Occasionally, they appear needlessly complex or lack an obvious economic rationale.

Spotting suspicious transactions often means watching for specific warning signs. These indicators, while diverse, generally include:

  • Unusual Transaction Size or Frequency: Transactions that significantly differ from a customer’s normal financial activities.
  • Geographic Anomalies: Transactions tied to high-risk locations or regions not usually linked with the customer.
  • Inconsistent Transactions: Transactions that clash with the customer’s known profile or business dealings.
  • Complex or Unusual Patterns: Transactions involving intricate structures, possibly indicating attempts to disguise the funds’ origins or destinations.
  • Anonymous Transactions: Use of untraceable payment methods or transactions involving hard-to-identify parties.

It’s crucial to remember that these indicators are not definitive evidence of malfeasance. They are hints necessitating further examination. Context is key—a transaction that appears suspicious under one set of circumstances might be entirely normal under another. Financial professionals must apply their judgment, experience, and client knowledge to contextualise and assess transactions.

Understanding suspicious transactions lays the groundwork for vigilant and proactive financial management. As we explore monitoring tools and the intricacies of the investigation process, remember that identifying these irregularities is the first step towards safeguarding the financial system’s integrity.

Upon flagging a suspicious transaction, whether by monitoring tools or manual observation, a meticulous investigation is imperative. This process is systematic, ensuring comprehensive scrutiny of the transaction’s every facet to ascertain its legitimacy.

  • Alert Review: The initial phase involves scrutinising the alert from the monitoring tool or suspicion report, discerning why the transaction was flagged, and pinpointing any immediate warning signs.
  • Preliminary Assessment: Conduct a swift evaluation to decide if the alert merits a full-scale investigation. Some transactions might be flagged for minor deviations from the norm, not necessarily indicating criminal activity.
  • Gathering Information: Compile all relevant data about the transaction, including involved parties, transaction nature, amounts, dates, and other crucial details.
  • Contextual Analysis: Contextualise the transaction. Assess it against the customer’s historical transaction patterns, profile, and known behaviours. Search for discrepancies or oddities.
  • Investigative Tools and Techniques: Employ various investigative methods, such as transaction pattern analysis, link analysis to uncover connections with other parties or transactions, and verification against databases of known financial criminals.
  • Assessment and Decision Making: Analyse the findings to determine the transaction’s legitimacy. If found suspicious, decide on the appropriate response, which might involve filing a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) with relevant authorities.
  • Documentation: Record every investigation stage. This documentation should be comprehensive and clear, as regulators or law enforcement may review it.
  • Feedback Loop: Provide input to enhance the monitoring system. If the investigation uncovers new suspicious patterns or indicators, update the system’s parameters to reflect these insights.
  • Escalation Procedures: If a transaction is deemed highly suspicious, escalate it to higher management or a specialized investigation unit, if available.
  • Regulatory Reporting: Adhere to legal and regulatory guidelines for reporting suspicious transactions. Ensure all reports are timely and meet the jurisdiction’s requirements.

This process marries technological tools with human expertise to ensure a thorough investigation of suspicious transactions. It’s a fluid process, evolving to counter new threats and tactics by those attempting to misuse the financial system. The objective is not just to identify and report suspicious transactions but also to fortify the overall monitoring and prevention framework.

Navigating the intricate legal and compliance landscape is a pivotal aspect of investigating and reporting suspicious transactions. This terrain is complex, peppered with diverse regulations and guidelines that financial institutions must follow. Comprehending and adhering to these legal mandates isn’t merely about rule compliance; it’s a commitment to the global crusade against financial crime.

  • Know Your Jurisdiction: Laws and regulations concerning suspicious transactions differ across countries and regions. Thorough familiarity with your organization’s operational jurisdictions’ specific legal mandates is crucial.
  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Laws: Most jurisdictions enforce stringent AML laws, encompassing customer due diligence, record-keeping, and suspicious activity reporting requirements.
  • Global Standards and Guidelines: Beyond local laws, international standards from bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) offer guidelines for detecting and reporting suspicious activities.
  • Filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs): A core compliance requisite is filing SARs or equivalent reports with the appropriate financial intelligence unit (FIU) or regulatory authority upon suspecting transactions linked to money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit activities.
  • Timeliness and Confidentiality: SARs must be filed within stipulated timeframes and handled confidentially to prevent alerting the individuals under investigation.
  • Establishing Robust Compliance Programs: Financial institutions should establish exhaustive compliance programs featuring policies, procedures, and controls for detecting, preventing, and reporting suspicious transactions.
  • Regular Training: Employees should receive continual training to stay abreast of the latest regulatory requirements, comprehend the institution’s processes, and effectively identify and report suspicious activities.
  • Understanding the Consequences of Non-Compliance: Non-adherence to AML and other financial regulations can lead to severe repercussions, including substantial fines, legal action, and reputational harm.
  • Ongoing Vigilance: Compliance is an enduring endeavour. As laws and regulations evolve, so should an institution’s policies and procedures.

By prioritising legal and compliance considerations, financial institutions not only shield themselves from legal risks but also contribute significantly to preserving the financial system’s integrity. This section underscores the importance of a proactive and knowledgeable approach to compliance, ensuring that institutions stay abreast of the continually shifting landscape of financial regulations.

Read the full post here.

Keep up with all the latest FinTech news here

Copyright © 2024 FinTech Global

Enjoying the stories?

Subscribe to our daily FinTech newsletter and get the latest industry news & research


The following investor(s) were tagged in this article.