Clinical audits are instrumental in the current healthcare system, serving as tools to elevate patient care and safety by evaluating and upgrading clinical methodologies. Though they are integral to healthcare improvement, clinical audits have identifiable limitations.
Various organisations today employ an array of audit tools over a period. However, the audit process varies considerably across these organisations. Those relying on paper or spreadsheets for their audits often find it challenging to address and remedy vital issues identified in these audits.
A significant reason for this is the considerable amount of time administrators spend collecting data, which leaves them with minimal time to address core issues. Organisations with optimised audit procedures have employed automation in data gathering and analysis, allowing more focus on understanding and rectifying audit findings.
There’s an apparent absence of consistency in clinical audits concerning audit criteria, methodologies, and report layouts. This inconsistency can hinder the comparative analysis of audit results both within and across various institutions.
To bridge this gap, the adoption and execution of standardised audit protocols and reporting methods are essential. Standardised procedures can bolster benchmarking and pave the way for sharing effective quality enhancement strategies. For instance, the Irish Mental Health Commission has recently unveiled a digital self-assessment tool to assist regulated entities in performing consistent self-evaluations, aiding their improvement.
A notable limitation of clinical audits is their often restricted scope. They predominantly focus on particular clinical processes, giving a limited view of healthcare quality. To illustrate, while an audit might assess adherence to antibiotic guidelines for a specific ailment, it might neglect broader patient care elements. To counter this, healthcare institutions should contemplate adopting a more inclusive clinical audit approach. The CQC’s new Single Assessment Framework, centred on the patient’s experience, is a step in this direction.
For clinical audits to be effective, it’s imperative for all stakeholders – be it clinicians, nurses, administrators, or patients – to be actively involved. However, stakeholder participation is frequently limited. Overcoming this requires healthcare entities to place a premium on stakeholder involvement and offer comprehensive training during the audit process. This collaborative effort can then better focus on delivering patient-centred care.
Clinical audits are invaluable in augmenting healthcare quality, they aren’t without their flaws. Addressing the aforementioned challenges can augment the efficacy of clinical audits in the quest for constant quality enhancement.
Read the story here.
Keep up with all the latest FinTech news here
Copyright © 2023 FinTech Global