A single consent order can dramatically change the direction of a bank’s compliance programme. For many institutions, this enforcement measure represents a pivotal moment — triggering stronger governance, renewed board accountability, and more robust controls to prevent regulatory breaches.
According to AIPrise, in May 2025, the FDIC reported twelve enforcement orders and two notices, including one consent order, underscoring regulators’ growing focus on accountability.
By understanding these patterns early, banks can prioritise proactive measures such as independent testing and tighter third-party oversight, reducing the cost and disruption of reactive remediation.
At its core, a consent order is a legally binding agreement between a bank and its regulator, requiring specific compliance weaknesses to be corrected. Typically, these arise after repeated AML, KYC, or risk management deficiencies have been identified. The institution must then execute a structured remediation plan, provide regular progress reports, and validate improvements through independent reviews.
The purpose of these orders is straightforward — to restore trust, reinforce oversight, and ensure ongoing operational soundness. Regulators issue them when compliance lapses risk financial stability or expose customers to misconduct. High-profile examples, such as the CFPB’s 2025 action against Wise US Inc., highlight the sector’s increasing scrutiny around AML and due diligence standards.
Once issued, a consent order drives deep transformation across a bank’s compliance framework. It enforces structure, accountability, and measurable improvement. Boards become directly responsible for overseeing progress, while leadership must document control enhancements and maintain transparent communication with regulators. These steps promote governance models that prevent recurring compliance failures.
Consent orders also formalise risk frameworks, requiring clear documentation of escalation paths and remediation procedures. Continuous monitoring becomes a regulatory expectation, with independent validation ensuring long-term sustainability rather than temporary fixes. Vendor and third-party oversight are tightened, ensuring external partners meet the same compliance standards as internal teams.
Regulators distinguish consent orders from other enforcement tools such as cease-and-desist actions or Matters Requiring Attention (MRAs). Unlike informal MRAs, consent orders are legally binding, publicly filed, and often impose operational limits until remediation is complete. They typically signal systemic control weaknesses rather than isolated issues.
Yet executing these orders presents significant challenges. Managing multiple remediation projects can strain resources and staff morale, while meeting strict regulatory deadlines adds further pressure. Disconnected systems complicate data reporting, and long remediation cycles can divert leadership focus from strategic priorities.
To stay on track, institutions often rely on structured action plans. A comprehensive checklist helps prioritise gap analysis, assign accountability, maintain documentation, and centralise regulator communications. Independent validation and strong board involvement ensure sustainable compliance progress.
Technology can play a pivotal role in accelerating this process. AiPrise offers AI-powered tools that help financial institutions close consent order gaps more efficiently. Its automated KYC and KYB verification draws on over 100 data sources, while document intelligence tools streamline identity and ownership verification. Real-time AML and sanctions screening, combined with AI-driven fraud detection, provide continuous monitoring.
The platform’s co-pilot for remediation automates case analysis and report generation, while its unified dashboard centralises progress tracking and regulator-ready documentation. Together, these features empower banks to rebuild trust, demonstrate transparency, and future-proof compliance systems against recurring risks.
A consent order should be viewed not as a setback, but as an opportunity to modernise compliance governance. With structured action and AI-powered tools like AiPrise, institutions can transform regulatory challenges into catalysts for sustainable improvement and long-term resilience.
Copyright © 2025 FinTech Global
