In a consolidating Dutch pension premium institution (PPI) market, those that build genuine participant experience capabilities now stand to capture a disproportionate share of employer mandates before the 2028 Wtp deadline reshapes the competitive landscape, according to Kidbrooke.
The Dutch PPI market is already consolidating. BeFrank reported assets under management growth of 29.9% in 2024 to €11.1bn across 1,200 employers, while Centraal Beheer PPI’s commercial director has publicly named a so-called “Final Five” of expected survivors. Around 40% of employer contracts are still expected to convert only at the final 1 January 2028 deadline, meaning a significant share of mandate decisions remain live and contestable.
Under the old defined benefit system, employers selected pension providers primarily on financial security and cost. Participant communication was largely a compliance formality. The Wtp changes that calculus structurally. A 2025 Belastingdienst ruling confirmed that employers carry a duty of care under Article 7:611 BW, which includes informing employees about their pension scheme and available choices. Employers selecting providers with weak participant communication now carry meaningful reputational and legal exposure.
Kidbrooke identifies four areas where participant experience becomes visible and measurable in a PPI tender. These are the personalisation of transition communications, the quality of digital planning environments, complaint track records on communication quality, and the sophistication of proactive engagement at key life moments. The AFM’s March 2025 Platform Pensioentransitie assessment found that transition communications remained largely generic rather than matched to individual participant figures, it said.
What distinguishes Kidbrooke’s analysis is the argument that these advantages compound over time. A PPI that deploys a high-quality digital planning environment in 2025–2026 accumulates participant engagement data, such as where users drop off, which scenarios they model, that progressively improves personalisation. A static portal accumulates nothing. Similarly, a consistent record of strong communication practice builds a regulatory relationship with the AFM that functions as a trust signal in employer conversations. Being cited as a good-practice example in AFM publications carries commercial value that cannot be rapidly manufactured.
Kidbrooke frames the strategic choice facing PPI executives as one of framing rather than whether to invest at all. Treating participant experience as a compliance cost produces minimum-viable infrastructure and no competitive distance. Treating it as a strategic asset produces mandate differentiation, participant retention, and a compounding data advantage.
For more insights, read the full story here.
Copyright © 2026 FinTech Global
