Leaders exploring AI-powered Regulatory Change Management (RCM) solutions face a growing number of complex choices. Supra Appikonda, co-founder and COO at 4CRisk.ai, offers key insights for compliance and risk professionals evaluating such tools, emphasising the importance of asking vendors the right questions to future-proof investments.
One of the first areas to assess is the practical business value of the solution. Buyers should look for clear ROI models that reflect realistic timelines, volumes, and end-to-end processes. Top vendors will offer evidence-backed efficiency gains, such as cost savings or improvements in review times, and support these claims with detailed case studies and templates.
Equally important is understanding how the AI technology actually works. Compliance leaders should challenge vendors to move beyond buzzwords and demonstrate how their models—such as those for horizon scanning, rulebook generation, or taxonomy mapping—are built and applied.
Effective AI-driven RCM also relies on curated, real-time regulatory intelligence. Professionals should ask how the platform collects and processes content from thousands of global sources, and whether it can accurately filter and correlate requirements across jurisdictions and formats. This ability is critical for creating comprehensive, dynamic obligation inventories that support consistent compliance.
Another important consideration is how the AI maps regulatory requirements to internal documentation such as policies, procedures, and contracts. Buyers should examine whether these systems use hybrid logic, machine learning, or rules-based models to drive relevance and context.
For true enterprise adoption, the AI platform must offer integration flexibility and strong workflow capabilities. APIs should be robust and well-documented.
Security, transparency, and governance are foundational. Vendors must show how they prevent hallucinations, explain AI outputs with confidence scores, and maintain rigorous audit trails. Buyers should look for clear AI governance processes, covering model training, validation, data sourcing, and continuous monitoring.
From a technical perspective, ask how the AI handles unstructured and structured data, and how domain-specific language models are trained and updated. Products that avoid using public LLMs for training and maintain strict privacy protocols are better suited for regulated environments.
Implementation support is another make-or-break factor. The best vendors will provide defined rollout timelines, user training, and change management support. Usability should also be top of mind—platforms must be intuitive and include human-in-the-loop steps to maintain oversight and accuracy.
Looking ahead, companies should assess the vendor’s roadmap. Future AI enhancements, user feedback loops, and ongoing product development should be a central part of the vendor’s vision. Responsible AI frameworks, ethical principles, and published best practices also demonstrate long-term commitment.
For more a mode detailed breakdown of what to consider when seeking AI-powered change management solutions, read the full story here.
Read the daily FinTech news here
Copyright © 2025 FinTech Global
