Sweeping new sanctions directed at the energy sector are reshaping global trade routes, compliance expectations, and logistical systems at an unprecedented scale.
The EU’s nineteenth sanctions package against Russia, paired with similar policies in the US and UK, marks a far-reaching effort to restrict trade with key energy firms and their subsidiaries, said Moody’s.
These measures have intensified geopolitical tensions while placing fresh demands on supply chains, which now face rising costs linked to shipping delays, insurance premiums, and operational bottlenecks.
Since 2022, sanctions imposed by the US, EU, and UK have driven notable changes in global oil flows. Russian crude shipments to Europe have reportedly fallen by around 60%, with delivery times doubling as vessels reroute via longer, more complex channels. Despite this disruption, overall export volumes remain near pre-2022 levels thanks to increased purchases by non-EU nations. However, the oil and gas sector continues to experience volatility as sanctions intersect with other geopolitical shocks. The Red Sea crisis caused a sharp surge in war-risk insurance premiums—rising by as much as 100%—while freight costs climbed up to 40%, all contributing to reduced visibility across supplier networks and elevated exposure to disruption and compliance failures.
In the face of rising uncertainty, major energy companies are turning to digital tools, predictive analytics, and diversified partnerships to enhance resilience. AI-powered systems capable of scanning thousands of data points in real time can now highlight sanctioned entities, calculate the implications of route changes, and help firms avoid breaches tied to indirect or extended sanctions. Following the EU’s nineteenth sanctions package in October 2025, indirect exposure has become a more prominent risk, with compliant shippers facing higher reinsurance premiums and restricted vessel availability. Insurers, operating under strict liability regimes, often price in the potential for penalties, making compliance strategy a central factor in operational costs.
Sanctions apply not only to listed companies, but also to subsidiaries, vessels, refineries, and entities sanctioned by extension through ownership and control rules. Determining whether a firm is captured under these provisions requires detailed assessments of beneficial ownership structures, which are often too complex for manual processes. Technology therefore plays an essential role, enabling real-time aggregation of ownership data and the visual mapping of subsidiary networks, which helps businesses understand how exposure can radiate outward from a single sanctioned organisation.
As global regulation tightens, the implications extend well beyond trade restrictions. Firms risk heavy fines, reputational damage, or even their own sanctions designation if they fail to perform adequate checks on third-party partners. These obligations sit alongside wider incoming frameworks, including the EU Deforestation Regulation and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, creating additional pressure on compliance teams. The energy companies best positioned to navigate this environment are those treating sanctions and regulation as catalysts for transformation—leveraging data, technology, and forward-looking risk management strategies to strengthen resilience.
Sanctions in the energy sector will likely continue reshaping global supply chains, introducing new operational challenges and risks. Yet organisations can use technology-driven tools to gain clarity on third-party relationships, assess financial health, and understand ownership dynamics. As sanctions regimes persist and evolve, automation, adaptability, and proactive risk strategies will be vital for maintaining continuity across an increasingly complex energy landscape.
Copyright © 2025 FinTech Global
