In July 2024, the FCA initiated a crucial dialogue within the financial sector by opening a consultation aimed at refining the treatment of PEPs.
According to Napier AI, this initiative is aligned with global standards advocated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which have been adopted by over 200 jurisdictions worldwide.
The FCA’s proposed amendments to the existing guidelines are multifaceted. Firstly, they introduce a new legal presumption that treats UK PEPs as inherently lower risk compared to their international counterparts. Furthermore, the guidelines clarify that non-executive members on the boards of civil service departments should not automatically be classified as PEPs. Another significant adjustment offers firms greater leeway in determining who within the organisation has the authority to approve or oversee relationships with PEPs.
Napier AI, a prominent player in the FinTech industry, has expressed strong support for these changes, recognising the necessity for financial institutions to implement risk-sensitive measures that are both adequate and proportionate. According to Napier AI, it is crucial that these measures be applied judiciously, on a case-by-case basis, to accurately assess the risk each individual PEP poses, rather than relying on a broad, one-size-fits-all strategy.
The complexity of managing PEPs is exacerbated by varying global definitions and the inconsistent status a PEP may hold across different jurisdictions. This inconsistency can lead to compliance challenges and due diligence oversights, particularly for UK financial institutions that operate on an international scale. Napier AI also advocates for a broader recognition of familial relationships beyond the immediate circle of a PEP, suggesting that cultural differences might extend the notion of ‘close family’ to include grandparents, siblings, and other extended relatives, thereby necessitating a more nuanced approach in risk assessment.
The effective use of global commercial databases is essential for screening PEPs, but Napier AI emphasises the importance of ensuring these databases robustly match names and accurately reflect the regulatory definitions of PEPs and their associates. These databases must be complemented with network analytics, which involves analytical techniques to map out and visualise relationships and connections, enhancing the identification and monitoring of PEPs.
Napier AI supports the adoption of a universal minimum standard for identifying and managing PEPs across various jurisdictions, advocating for a framework that accommodates local regulatory nuances while maintaining overall compliance standards. Additionally, they highlight the pitfalls of over-reliance on historical data, which can obscure current risks and delay responses to evolving threats. Instead, they propose a perpetual, real-time approach to monitoring and assessing PEP-related risks.
The proposed guideline changes also cover the approval processes for PEP relationships. With a specific nod to the oversight role of the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) under SMF 17, it is suggested that while lower risk PEPs may require less stringent oversight, it remains crucial to maintain regular internal communications and standardised training to ensure consistent application of the established risk criteria.
Napier AI champions the use of a Perpetual Customer Risk Assessment (PCRA) framework, which integrates real-time data from various sources to offer a comprehensive, 360-degree view of a client’s risk profile. This approach not only facilitates more informed decision-making but also ensures that financial institutions can swiftly adjust to changes in a PEP’s risk status, fostering a more secure financial environment.
Keep up with all the latest FinTech news here
Copyright © 2024 FinTech Global
