Banks have long borne the brunt of regulatory scrutiny over anti-money laundering (AML) controls, but life insurers handling large premiums are increasingly attracting the attention of criminals and watchdogs alike. In South Africa, the sector’s perceived complacency is fast becoming a liability.
Long-term insurers have been classed as accountable institutions under the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA) for years, South African RegTech RelyComply detailed.
Yet many have failed to modernise their monitoring to keep pace with increasingly sophisticated launderers. The industry’s challenge is to stop treating AML as a periodic box-ticking exercise and start treating it as a continuous, proactive defence.
Life insurance appeals to launderers for structural reasons. Policies are socially normal, long-term financial planning tools, which makes them better camouflage than a large one-off cash deposit. Extended policy durations also let criminals stretch the placement and integration stages over years, muddying the audit trail. Hybrid products such as universal life insurance, which can be tax-deferred or linked to funds, bonds or equities, open further channels for illicit money.
The core weakness is timing. While banks typically monitor customers continuously, many insurers have concentrated verification at two moments: when a policy is issued and when a claim is made. That can leave years of activity largely unchecked.
Regulatory pressure has intensified. South Africa was placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) greylist in February 2023 and, after 32 months of reform, exited in October 2025. However, the scrutiny has not eased. Life insurers remain overseen by the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), the Prudential Authority and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA). The FIC now expects firms to show how effectively they monitor customer and transaction data, not simply to document their controls.
Several typologies routinely slip through. Early surrender sees a launderer pay a large single premium, then cash out within about 36 months, accepting a penalty in exchange for funds paid out by a regulated firm. Overpayments exploit systems that flag missed payments but ignore excess ones, with criminals requesting clean refunds. Policy loans let holders borrow against accumulated cash value, recycling funds without triggering surrender alerts.
Generic, rules-based banking tools often miss these patterns. Static risk ratings assigned at onboarding quickly go stale, while poorly calibrated alerts produce floods of false positives for stretched compliance teams.
RegTech offers a way forward. Insurance-ready AML platforms combine behavioural pattern recognition across the full policy lifecycle, rationality scoring of premium behaviour, real-time sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening, automated escalation into enhanced due diligence, and audit trails that satisfy FIC expectations.
As South Africa heads into its next FATF Mutual Evaluation cycle, insurers that tailor AML to their own products, rather than copying bank frameworks, will be best placed to protect their reputations with regulators, investors and partners.
Read the full RelyComply post here.
Copyright © 2026 FinTech Global
